How megacities are changing the map of the world | Parag Khanna

How megacities are changing the map of the world | Parag Khanna


I want you to reimagine
how life is organized on earth. Think of the planet
like a human body that we inhabit. The skeleton is the transportation system
of roads and railways, bridges and tunnels, air and seaports that enable our mobility
across the continents. The vascular system that powers the body are the oil and gas pipelines
and electricity grids. that distribute energy. And the nervous system of communications is the Internet cables,
satellites, cellular networks and data centers that allow
us to share information. This ever-expanding infrastructural matrix already consists of 64 million
kilometers of roads, four million kilometers of railways, two million kilometers of pipelines and one million kilometers
of Internet cables. What about international borders? We have less than
500,000 kilometers of borders. Let’s build a better map of the world. And we can start by overcoming
some ancient mythology. There’s a saying with which
all students of history are familiar: “Geography is destiny.” Sounds so grave, doesn’t it? It’s such a fatalistic adage. It tells us that landlocked countries
are condemned to be poor, that small countries
cannot escape their larger neighbors, that vast distances are insurmountable. But every journey I take around the world, I see an even greater force
sweeping the planet: connectivity. The global connectivity revolution,
in all of its forms — transportation, energy
and communications — has enabled such a quantum leap
in the mobility of people, of goods, of resources, of knowledge, such that we can no longer even think
of geography as distinct from it. In fact, I view the two forces
as fusing together into what I call “connectography.” Connectography represents a quantum leap in the mobility of people,
resources and ideas, but it is an evolution, an evolution of the world
from political geography, which is how we legally divide the world, to functional geography, which is how we actually use the world, from nations and borders,
to infrastructure and supply chains. Our global system is evolving from the vertically integrated
empires of the 19th century, through the horizontally interdependent
nations of the 20th century, into a global network civilization
in the 21st century. Connectivity, not sovereignty, has become the organizing principle
of the human species. (Applause) We are becoming
this global network civilization because we are literally building it. All of the world’s defense budgets
and military spending taken together total just under
two trillion dollars per year. Meanwhile, our global
infrastructure spending is projected to rise
to nine trillion dollars per year within the coming decade. And, well, it should. We have been living
off an infrastructure stock meant for a world population
of three billion, as our population has crossed
seven billion to eight billion and eventually nine billion and more. As a rule of thumb, we should spend
about one trillion dollars on the basic infrastructure needs
of every billion people in the world. Not surprisingly, Asia is in the lead. In 2015, China announced the creation of the Asian Infrastructure
Investment Bank, which together with a network
of other organizations aims to construct a network
of iron and silk roads, stretching from Shanghai to Lisbon. And as all of this topographical
engineering unfolds, we will likely spend more
on infrastructure in the next 40 years, we will build more infrastructure
in the next 40 years, than we have in the past 4,000 years. Now let’s stop and think
about it for a minute. Spending so much more on building
the foundations of global society rather than on the tools to destroy it can have profound consequences. Connectivity is how
we optimize the distribution of people and resources around the world. It is how mankind comes to be more
than just the sum of its parts. I believe that is what is happening. Connectivity has a twin megatrend
in the 21st century: planetary urbanization. Cities are the infrastructures
that most define us. By 2030, more than two thirds
of the world’s population will live in cities. And these are not
mere little dots on the map, but they are vast archipelagos
stretching hundreds of kilometers. Here we are in Vancouver, at the head of the Cascadia Corridor that stretches south
across the US border to Seattle. The technology powerhouse
of Silicon Valley begins north of San Francisco
down to San Jose and across the bay to Oakland. The sprawl of Los Angeles
now passes San Diego across the Mexican border to Tijuana. San Diego and Tijuana
now share an airport terminal where you can exit into either country. Eventually, a high-speed rail network
may connect the entire Pacific spine. America’s northeastern megalopolis
begins in Boston through New York and Philadelphia to Washington. It contains more than 50 million people and also has plans
for a high-speed rail network. But Asia is where we really see
the megacities coming together. This continuous strip of light
from Tokyo through Nagoya to Osaka contains more than 80 million people and most of Japan’s economy. It is the world’s largest megacity. For now. But in China, megacity clusters
are coming together with populations
reaching 100 million people. The Bohai Rim around Beijing, The Yangtze River Delta around Shanghai and the Pearl River Delta, stretching from Hong Kong
north to Guangzhou. And in the middle, the Chongqing-Chengdu megacity cluster, whose geographic footprint
is almost the same size as the country of Austria. And any number of these megacity clusters has a GDP approaching
two trillion dollars — that’s almost the same
as all of India today. So imagine if our global diplomatic
institutions, such as the G20, were to base their membership
on economic size rather than national representation. Some Chinese megacities
may be in and have a seat at the table, while entire countries,
like Argentina or Indonesia would be out. Moving to India, whose population
will soon exceed that of China, it too has a number of megacity clusters, such as the Delhi Capital Region and Mumbai. In the Middle East, Greater Tehran is absorbing
one third of Iran’s population. Most of Egypt’s 80 million people live in the corridor
between Cairo and Alexandria. And in the gulf, a necklace
of city-states is forming, from Bahrain and Qatar, through the United Arab Emirates
to Muscat in Oman. And then there’s Lagos, Africa’s largest city
and Nigeria’s commercial hub. It has plans for a rail network that will make it the anchor
of a vast Atlantic coastal corridor, stretching across Benin, Togo and Ghana, to Abidjan, the capital
of the Ivory Coast. But these countries are suburbs of Lagos. In a megacity world, countries can be suburbs of cities. By 2030, we will have as many
as 50 such megacity clusters in the world. So which map tells you more? Our traditional map
of 200 discrete nations that hang on most of our walls, or this map of the 50 megacity clusters? And yet, even this is incomplete because you cannot understand
any individual megacity without understanding
its connections to the others. People move to cities to be connected, and connectivity
is why these cities thrive. Any number of them,
such as Sao Paulo or Istanbul or Moscow, has a GDP approaching or exceeding
one third of one half of their entire national GDP. But equally importantly, you cannot calculate
any of their individual value without understanding
the role of the flows of people, of finance, of technology that enable them to thrive. Take the Gauteng province of South Africa, which contains Johannesburg
and the capital Pretoria. It too represents just over
a third of South Africa’s GDP. But equally importantly,
it is home to the offices of almost every single
multinational corporation that invests directly into South Africa and indeed, into the entire
African continent. Cities want to be part
of global value chains. They want to be part
of this global division of labor. That is how cities think. I’ve never met a mayor who said to me, “I want my city to be cut off.” They know that their cities belong as much to the global network civilization
as to their home countries. Now, for many people,
urbanization causes great dismay. They think cities are wrecking the planet. But right now, there are more than 200
intercity learning networks thriving. That is as many as the number
of intergovernmental organizations that we have. And all of these intercity networks
are devoted to one purpose, mankind’s number one priority
in the 21st century: sustainable urbanization. Is it working? Let’s take climate change. We know that summit after summit
in New York and Paris is not going to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions. But what we can see
is that transferring technology and knowledge and policies between cities is how we’ve actually begun to reduce
the carbon intensity of our economies. Cities are learning from each other. How to install zero-emissions buildings, how to deploy electric
car-sharing systems. In major Chinese cities, they’re imposing quotas
on the number of cars on the streets. In many Western cities, young people don’t even
want to drive anymore. Cities have been part of the problem, now they are part of the solution. Inequality is the other great challenge
to achieving sustainable urbanization. When I travel through megacities
from end to end — it takes hours and days — I experience the tragedy
of extreme disparity within the same geography. And yet, our global stock
of financial assets has never been larger, approaching 300 trillion dollars. That’s almost four times
the actual GDP of the world. We have taken on such enormous debts
since the financial crisis, but have we invested them
in inclusive growth? No, not yet. Only when we build sufficient,
affordable public housing, when we invest in robust
transportation networks to allow people to connect to each other
both physically and digitally, that’s when our divided
cities and societies will come to feel whole again. (Applause) And that is why infrastructure
has just been included in the United Nations
Sustainable Development Goals, because it enables all the others. Our political and economic leaders are learning that connectivity
is not charity, it’s opportunity. And that’s why our financial community
needs to understand that connectivity is the most
important asset class of the 21st century. Now, cities can make the world
more sustainable, they can make the world more equitable, I also believe that
connectivity between cities can make the world more peaceful. If we look at regions of the world
with dense relations across borders, we see more trade, more investment and more stability. We all know the story
of Europe after World War II, where industrial integration
kicked off a process that gave rise to today’s
peaceful European Union. And you can see that Russia, by the way, is the least connected of major powers
in the international system. And that goes a long way
towards explaining the tensions today. Countries that have
less stake in the system also have less to lose in disturbing it. In North America, the lines
that matter most on the map are not the US-Canada border
or the US-Mexico border, but the dense network of roads
and railways and pipelines and electricity grids
and even water canals that are forming an integrated
North American union. North America does not need more walls,
it needs more connections. (Applause) But the real promise of connectivity
is in the postcolonial world. All of those regions where borders
have historically been the most arbitrary and where generations of leaders have had hostile relations
with each other. But now a new group of leaders
has come into power and is burying the hatchet. Let’s take Southeast Asia,
where high-speed rail networks are planned to connect
Bangkok to Singapore and trade corridors
from Vietnam to Myanmar. Now this region of 600 million people
coordinates its agricultural resources and its industrial output. It is evolving
into what I call a Pax Asiana, a peace among Southeast Asian nations. A similar phenomenon
is underway in East Africa, where a half dozen countries are investing in railways
and multimodal corridors so that landlocked countries
can get their goods to market. Now these countries
coordinate their utilities and their investment policies. They, too, are evolving
into a Pax Africana. One region we know could
especially use this kind of thinking is the Middle East. As Arab states tragically collapse, what is left behind
but the ancient cities, such as Cairo, Beirut and Baghdad? In fact, the nearly
400 million people of the Arab world are almost entirely urbanized. As societies, as cities, they are either water rich or water poor, energy rich or energy poor. And the only way
to correct these mismatches is not through more wars and more borders, but through more connectivity
of pipelines and water canals. Sadly, this is not yet
the map of the Middle East. But it should be, a connected Pax Arabia, internally integrated and productively connected
to its neighbors: Europe, Asia and Africa. Now, it may not seem like connectivity
is what we want right now towards the world’s most turbulent region. But we know from history
that more connectivity is the only way to bring about stability in the long run. Because we know
that in region after region, connectivity is the new reality. Cities and countries
are learning to aggregate into more peaceful and prosperous wholes. But the real test is going to be Asia. Can connectivity overcome
the patterns of rivalry among the great powers of the Far East? After all, this is where World War III
is supposed to break out. Since the end of the Cold War,
a quarter century ago, at least six major wars
have been predicted for this region. But none have broken out. Take China and Taiwan. In the 1990s, this was everyone’s
leading World War III scenario. But since that time, the trade and investment volumes
across the straits have become so intense that last November, leaders from both sides
held a historic summit to discuss eventual
peaceful reunification. And even the election
of a nationalist party in Taiwan that’s pro-independence earlier this year does not undermine
this fundamental dynamic. China and Japan have
an even longer history of rivalry and have been deploying
their air forces and navies to show their strength in island disputes. But in recent years, Japan has been making
its largest foreign investments in China. Japanese cars are selling
in record numbers there. And guess where
the largest number of foreigners residing in Japan today comes from? You guessed it: China. China and India have fought a major war and have three outstanding
border disputes, but today India is the second
largest shareholder in the Asian Infrastructure
Investment Bank. They’re building a trade corridor
stretching from Northeast India through Myanmar and Bangladesh
to Southern China. Their trade volume has grown
from 20 billion dollars a decade ago to 80 billion dollars today. Nuclear-armed India and Pakistan
have fought three wars and continue to dispute Kashmir, but they’re also negotiating
a most-favored-nation trade agreement and want to complete a pipeline stretching from Iran
through Pakistan to India. And let’s talk about Iran. Wasn’t it just two years ago
that war with Iran seemed inevitable? Then why is every single major power
rushing to do business there today? Ladies and gentlemen, I cannot guarantee
that World War III will not break out. But we can definitely see
why it hasn’t happened yet. Even though Asia is home
to the world’s fastest growing militaries, these same countries
are also investing billions of dollars in each other’s infrastructure
and supply chains. They are more interested
in each other’s functional geography than in their political geography. And that is why their leaders think twice,
step back from the brink, and decide to focus on economic ties
over territorial tensions. So often it seems
like the world is falling apart, but building more connectivity is how we put Humpty Dumpty
back together again, much better than before. And by wrapping the world in such seamless physical
and digital connectivity, we evolve towards a world in which people can rise
above their geographic constraints. We are the cells and vessels pulsing through these global
connectivity networks. Everyday, hundreds of millions
of people go online and work with people they’ve never met. More than one billion people
cross borders every year, and that’s expected to rise
to three billion in the coming decade. We don’t just build connectivity, we embody it. We are the global network civilization, and this is our map. A map of the world in which
geography is no longer destiny. Instead, the future
has a new and more hopeful motto: connectivity is destiny. Thank you. (Applause)

100 thoughts on “How megacities are changing the map of the world | Parag Khanna

  1. investing in networks and pipelines does not deter war necessarily

    firstly , country A may invade B should the latter chocked off the network or pipeline – think Iraq

    secondly , domestic populist politics may force elected officials to turn inwards – think Trump and Briexit

  2. Canadians applauding a North American Union? LOL
    The US population is 9x larger than that of Canada; its economy is nearly 12x larger. Guess who'll be calling the shots….
    (Ask people in the EU how they feel about Germany, even though Germany's share of the EU is big only in relative terms, not absolute terms.)

  3. Technocracy….'Rising'…Technocrats scare me! just as Huxley 'Brave New World' or zbigniew Brzezinski "Between Two Ages". QUOTE: "“A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.”
    ― Aldous Huxley, Brave New World *Was this just a dystopian, scientific/technocratic dictatorship fiction? OR was it a 'warning' or prediction of the future…the now?

  4. Less people on our planet, and a 100% transparent system where everybody has the same say/vote. That is my humble wish 🙂 Tnx for making people think 🙂

  5. Connectivity is just one part of what we need. Water, food, clean air, economy etc. We connect to places because of their substance, if Sahara had great connectivity who would live there ? We are part of nature and we live in places which are able to provide our needs

  6. Great talk. I would counter only that the notion of "connectivity" as discussed here reflects evolving scales and conceptualizations of geography, rather than a completely-new framework. Location still matters.

  7. he's a good storyteller and a good salesman. The irony is that we are more connected than we have ever been yet we don't even make eye contact with the person next to us on the trains he speaks of because were staring at our phone instead.

  8. 13:55 he isnt saying he supports illegal migration hes saying that it needs more infrastructure and connectivity, to all of the trump supporters like me

  9. What is he talking has been teorized in the so called Libertarian Municipalism by Murray Bookchin and is part of the anarchist ideology. The reorganization of the State is better than the destruction of it,even Marx moved against the anarchism by saying the communist society wasn't suppose to delete the State but to bring to the natural extinction of it through the abiltion of the social classes. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarian_municipalism

  10. We are not countries anymore.
    We are 200 people huddled in a room.
    It's time to shake hands, say "Hi", and work together to take the collective leap of searching for next room.
    Let's open the doors and not build artificial walls

  11. Libs, I’m talk ‘in to you. Your DNA determines more about YOU than any choice YOU believe YOU make freely. Your DNA determines, size, weight, skin color, hair color, man, woman, how long you live, strength, intelligence just to name a few. So where do you draw the line in what the DNA expresses and what YOU, by free choice, express. (opps free choice, sorry getting kind of close to God stuff there) Many attributes are a result of natural selection long before langue, they are still dominant in the DNA, no? They must be. Take for example hunter, gatherer, the two survival strategies are part of the programming in human males and females. Hunters have to create opportunity to survive. Gatherers have to harvest what is available to survive. It is similar with liberal and conservative, although not as pronounced. More women tend to be liberal and more men tend to be conservative. Liberals are more concerned with harvesting what is available and sharing what is found. Where conservatives are more concerned about creating opportunity and rewarding leadership and the skillful to improve the odds and mutual benefit for the next hunt. When the culture turns toward primarily gathering, due to the lack of opportunity or media bias, or rapid technology change and actively frustrates opportunity or punishes success resulting from creating opportunity, more men will become disenfranchised. It is a socially created consequence driven by Marxist politics and your own female DNA. Russia is a good example. Alcoholism among males is extreme in Russia. The birth rate in Russia is below replacement. Next, why you need not be a victim of your own DNA.

  12. IQ, religion, lack of religion and resulting political stability are more determinant than your geography crap. Your Marxism ideology is really annoying and has biased your thinking in to the insane.

  13. Why is it that its always the people from struggling countrys that see the entire world as "one body"… while successfully operating countrys prefer the body THEY have developed… Its all word salad for globalism… people wanting what others have,… in its purest form,… someone has to be the foot and someone has to be the head.. Thats how the body works…

  14. Very interesting, but I have not heard about unavoidable issues related to the development of cities and infrastructure; such as land use, cementation, reduction of eco-system services and other impoverishments.

  15. Furthermore, the slowness and the quality of the movements should be reevaluated in contrast to the frenzy city life.

  16. Are landlocked countries not bound to be poor? Ask about the accuracy of your statement to the Armenians, Uzbeks, Mongols… Can Small countries escape bigger countries around them? Ask this to Andorra, Qatar, Luxemburg… TED talks for some unknown reason have the best visuals and worst analyses. Funny.

  17. moving to such a mega-city format of legislation would disadvantage people living in rural areas even more so than they are now

  18. Megacity full with people. One day theres a collapse ( everyone starts killing each other, rape and crime for resources. The cities infrastructure collapse there are dead decomposing bodies everywhere. When the bodies are decomposing disease spreads and people get infected and die that way as well just like te black plague) thanks but no thanks i will stay im my rural area. Humans never learn from history

  19. Oh, so Russia is now "disturbing the system"? The system that forms 50% of it's federal budget through exports, mainly to the EU? That's really funny.

  20. But China is building cities that no one lives in. Pretty facades are being built with cheap materials by contractors that cut corners and colapse in an Earthquake. Buildings go up faster than the sewer systems that support them. How afordable is the housing? What happens when you loose your job? What happens when people get sick? How do you stop disease from spreading?

    Just some of the problems with the mega city models that should be addressed but often aren't.

  21. I find it funny he says the United states is connecting with other countries when the US purposely makes it longer and harder to cross border by mexico

  22. He’s says no mayor has ever wanted his city to be cut off and not be part of connectivity to every other part of the world and movement of people .Well Mumbai mayors for past several decades have won elections on a single agenda of NOT allowing “outsiders” to enter the city!Would love to hear from him of the future where Mumbai(like every other mega city ) would be 100 million people by 2050!

  23. superb speaker doesn't mean everything he say is addressing the essential, and life of all human beings; he speaks of mega-cities, mega-infrastructures, mega-world, he care nothing for people who choose to leave in nature or the preservation of nature and Wilde life, he dismisses the fact that every life supports life, not only technology, He is however good talking machine for the AI future of AI. I have attended on of his presentations and he simply dismisses questions about small countries and poor countries that are strangled by illegal sanctions imposed by the mega-govs for so many years because the poor-small countries are called "illegal-countries" by the speakers standard.

  24. Have Italians lost individuality by being in the EU? Have texans lost individuality by being in the US? The same argument could be used for living in a isolated shack in the wilderness: If i build a road to the village, I'll lose individuality?… No, but I'll have healthcare, education and opportunities.
    What even is this primitive individuality we talk of? If we value it so much, lets go back to individual tribes, or even regress to solitary animals like polar bears (who don't see a fellow species member for months on end).

  25. As long as there is still religion nothing of this will ever happen. Also for the record, Australia is a much better and exploding country than most of the countries/cities for which most of of the talk was focused on. Doesn;t surprise me, a murican being an ignorant murican peddling his agenda

  26. Connectivity depends on fuel for vehicles – dwindling Petroleum products. This will put an upper bound on "Connectivity" or at least refashion it. Electric Cars are the new entrant. But it will depend on more & more power packed batteries, still to evolve. For these, Electricity supply is through 'charging' for which mega power generating plants are required which need 'fuel' – either coal, petro- based fuels & lately 'nuclear' power. U235 power generation is old hat & Thorium based power projects struggle to come up (against the U235 entrenched, nuclear power plants). Air-transport will grow exponentially & is based on petro-based 'ATF' that will rule for the next century at least. Electrical Battery based aero engines are being dreamt of, but will take at least a century.

  27. This is exactly what China is trying to do, the Belt and Road Initiative, connecting Asia, Europe and Africa! Chinese culture is a culture of peace, through our more than 4000 years of history of peace and turmoil Chinese have learned that negotiation is always better than war.

  28. What kind of an idiot wants to promote globalism? Why would we care about his opinion? He should be learning instead of talking… Momma didn't spank him enough I'd say.

  29. seamless world through connectivity is the way to go, but many countries are not ready still battling with the basics of life

  30. Great talk .I loved your perspective and could not be in agreement more. I wish the new Govt in India which will be sworn in post May 23, 2019 will employ people like you in policy making roles.

  31. Connectivity. It's always more apparent how Bitcoin, Monero and other cryptocurrencies can turn into globally accepted and accessible currencies.

  32. Please Study : YouTube: Pyramids , cold Fusion- , who controls all of our money 💰 and Zeitgeist Movement 🌎 The Global Spiritual Awakening Of Humanity🔑 Agenda 21. Project for the New American Century 🔎 Credo Mutiwa please tell, your message and these other videos ; to 9 Billion Human and about being conscious , thanks🔑

  33. His assessment is scary. We need to compartmentalize evil. The city cluster civilization will unify people into a mob of evil

  34. A sense a hint of Globalism here….

    Would be nice if your fairy tale included, you know, some reflection of the realities on the ground.

  35. This is great for those rich socialist bastards. But the goal is to control all the world's best places and land by the useless hordes in unsustainable filthy megacity states living hundreds of miles from peaceful rural agricultural resource rich regions. 
    Sorry but China isn't taking out resource rich Western Canada and its small population. China and other overpopulated countries think that they are just going to immigrate into these areas and eventually dislocate and eliminate the old order and their wealth. Forget it. This guy is full of SH=T. And so is the rose coloured glass sitting in the audience. trudeau must have been writing his notes

  36. Does this guy really believe islam is just going to evaporate from its goals of world influence because of connectivity? No. Its going to make it even easier for that and other cults of the world like communism to infiltrate smaller democracies. Democracies work when the people have common goals and culture. China is out for china and nobody else. It has no aspirations to adapt western cultures but to replace them with authoritarian social orders. The more money we give them the more likely we go to the guillotine. This dude sounds happy that the west is doomed.

  37. I think he has confused crony capitalism with growth.

    That's what right wing governments are doing. They are supported by crony Capitalists who keep the local population poor and uneducated so that they are easy to control and fool.
    The countries economy may grow but only benefits the elite. The right wing leaders show bravado and look tough on neighbors. But are actually soft on them. They are there only to support their bosses the crony capitalists and not people. They turn a blind eye to automation, poverty, unemployment, lack of education or any real problems facing the country.
    They also turn blind eye to climate change and shameless exploitation of Earth's resources. That's the most dangerous thing for they are destroying the future.

    Just look at US, Russia, India, China or any other right wing governments as that's what most countries have.

  38. Some of it is interesting. But in the long arc of the future he discusses, the major geopolitics of fossil is most likely supplanted by renewables

  39. Fantastic speech! This IS our destiny. We must realize the global community and start building the bridges that will connect all of us. We must do this. We will do this.Thanks, Mr. Khanna

  40. This is very utopian, ignoring the antagonistic relations between the different imperialist powers and regional capitalist nations. Whether you like it or not, the lawful workings of capitalism is leading us towards WWIII, same thing that led to WWI and WWII. Read V.I. Lenin's "Imperialism; The Highest Stage of Capitalism".

    To get the type of unitary planned connectivity Khanna is talking about is only possible through worldwide socialist revolution.

  41. Globalists tend to ignore the human side of human society. Free humans can't be governed globally. As a survival mechanism, we have evolved to engage in tribalism and regardless of our efforts to control that aspect of our nature, it will always creep in on us where and when we aren't expecting it. It is not politics that needs lines on a map it is human nature that requires them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *